Supreme Court sides with Biden administration in social media case

Republican-led states argued that social media platforms can violate the Constitution by blocking conservative views.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Biden administration in a dispute with Republican-led states regarding the federal government’s authority to address controversial social media posts related to topics like COVID-19 and election security.

By a 6-3 vote, the justices overturned lower-court rulings that supported claims by states like Louisiana and Missouri that the Democratic administration pressured social media platforms to silence conservative viewpoints unconstitutionally.


The big picture: Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the court, stating that the states and other parties lacked the legal standing to sue, with Justices Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas dissenting.

  • The case is part of several this term involving social media companies and free speech, including laws in Florida and Texas and public officials blocking social media followers.
  • The disputes revolve around allegations of censoring conservative viewpoints, with claims that government officials pressured social media platforms to change online content.
  • While concerns were raised during arguments, the Biden administration highlighted the implications of losing the ability to address issues like antisemitism, national security, and public health with social media platforms.
  • The Supreme Court decision did not address the substance of the claims, focusing instead on the lack of standing of the plaintiffs to seek an injunction.

Flashback: The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had previously ruled that the Biden administration applied unconstitutional pressure on media platforms, leading to the eventual Supreme Court ruling in this case.

Related Posts