Calif. policies choking off water from Valley hasn’t been savior for fish, report finds.

The report offered a damning picture of the thirty-year shift in how the Golden State divvied up water, largely pitting fish species against millions of its residents.

A new policy brief from the Public Policy Institute of California is recommending cost-effective water storage investments as the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is seeing less inflow.

It also offers a damning picture of the thirty-year shift in how the Golden State divvied up water, largely pitting fish species against millions of its residents.


The institute – a nonpartisan think tank – initially published the brief in early spring, focuses on the Delta that supplies water to about 30 million residents and over six million acres of farmland. 

“The ecological health of the Delta and the reliability of its water supplies are in decline,” the brief reads. “Given the challenges facing the watershed and the competing uses for scarce supplies, Delta water management issues are a source of conflict and many misunderstandings about water use. Weak water accounting systems make this worse.” 

The brief notes that a “significant portion” of runoff in the watershed flows into the San Francisco Bay. Some of that runoff is necessary to repel seawater, otherwise the Delta would be unusable by cities and farms. 

But state regulations have added additional outflow to protect the ecosystem and several species of endangered fish. Dry years see the regulation outflow as small compared to the necessary water to repel seawater, but the outflow greatly increases during wet years. 

The institute notes that the outflow to protect endangered species accounts for about 10 percent of all water available in very wet years, while during severe drought that number drops to six percent. 

According to the brief, a significant rise in temperatures over the past few decades, to go along with the late dry spells the state has faced, has impacted water use and outflow with the following five trends: 

  1. Upstream use is rising while Delta inflow is falling: Last year, upstream uses accounted for a record 84 percent of runoff from the watershed. “This shift is reducing inflows to the Delta, making it harder to meet other management objectives,” the brief reads. 
  2. Maintaining Delta salinity requires more outflow: Conditions changed in the 1990s to require greater outflow to repel seawater. But the brief notes that reasons for the change are not well-documented, so research is underway to improve understanding. 
  3. Environmental regulations have also increased Delta outflow: Policy changes since the 1990s set pumping limits and regulated water flow to protect endangered species. “Despite these changes, populations of many native species and the health of Delta ecosystems continue to decline,” the brief reads. 
  4. Dry year management increasingly relies on emergency measures: Models suggest that increased drought intensity and reduced snowpack are here to stay, but the last decade has seen the response hinge on gubernatorial drought emergency declarations. 
  5. Wet years are increasingly important for supply: “During very wet years, a large volume of water is uncapturable, and insufficient capacity to store water south of the Delta becomes a limitation on export pumping,” the brief reads. “Expanding above- and below-ground storage capacity could increase Delta exports without changing current regulations. In such years, more water could also be captured and stored upstream. Managers also need to adapt how they manage water storage in the watershed in a warming climate, where the snowpack is storing less water than it has historically.” 

Ultimately, the institute finds that improving storage capacity south of the Delta would allow for 400,000 acre-feet or more of additional exports during wet years.

Related Posts