Fresno OKs negotiating once-banned labor deals for airport expansion

The Fresno City Council unanimously approved a measure to begin negotiating a project-labor agreement for the city’s FATForward expansion project at Fresno-Yosemite International Airport.

The Fresno City Council unanimously approved a measure to begin negotiating a project-labor agreement for the city’s FATForward expansion project at Fresno-Yosemite International Airport.

Project-labor agreements, which serve as pre-hiring collective bargaining agreements with labor unions, have been argued to put non-union contractors at a disadvantage, as workers must typically be members of a union.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 2000, the City banned the use of project-labor agreements in city contracting. The ban was lifted by the City Council in 2014 under pressure to receive funding from the State of California for the Transformative Climate Communities collaborative program.

Both the 2014 lift on the PLA ban and the FATForward PLA negotiation received the endorsement of then-City Councilman and now-Mayor Lee Brand.

At stake in the negotiations is whether non-union contractors will be able to have a role in the City’s $115 million airport expansion project.

Ahead of the Council meeting, Nicole Goehring of the Associated Builders and Contractors argued in an op-ed that PLAs can serve some harm to local non-union contractors as they often are required to hire local workers from a designated union that may not be as skilled as their own employees or push out local non-union contractors in favor of out-of-town union contractors.

Eric Christen of the Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction argued for non-union contractor representatives to have a seat at the negotiating table to ensure that they would have an opportunity at the project. Councilman Steve Brandau echoed the concern that they non-union voices would be heard during the negotiating process.

Also looming over the PLA issue was the travails of the City of Selma’s pursuit of a new police station, for which only one bid was provided at more than $1 million over-budget.

Councilman Miguel Arias dismissed the Selma example, arguing that increased construction costs, not the PLA, were at-fault for the need for a re-bid.

Any PLA on the FATForward will ultimately need to be approved by the full City Council.

Total
0
Shares
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts