On Thursday, the California legislature passed a new eviction protection plan that will extend the eviction moratorium until June.
Governor Gavin Newsom also indicated Thursday that he will sign the legislation, ensuring the new moratorium end date will go into effect before the current eviction moratorium ends on Sunday.
The new legislation carries over much of the current eviction moratorium but with a few key differences in favor of landlords. Starting February 1st, tenants can qualify for protections as long as they pay 25 percent of the rent each month or pay it in a lump sum payment by June 30.
Like before, tenants can only qualify for this as long as they sign paperwork attesting that they are facing financial hardships due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
If not paid, landlords can sue to get the money back in court but cannot sue for eviction.
However, landlords will also now have an important decision for each tenant currently under COVID-19 eviction protection. Landlords can choose to either receive 80% of the unpaid rent from the state as long as they agree to forgive the other 20% and pledge not to evict the tenant for actions made until June 30th, or they can get 25% from the state to protect all tenants from being evicted but then can pursue eviction after June 30th.
However, despite the sweeping extension, many both in and out of the Capitol criticized the extension, including many landlord groups who had fought tooth and nail to avoid foreclosures if the extension had gone on until December 2021.
“Besides the extension, they didn’t listen to landlords,” said Victoria Phan, a “30-units-and-under” Los Angeles-based landlord group leader, to the Globe. “Instead of being allowed to do everything legally within our rights, they are telling us ‘Hey, you can either have most of the money you’re owed or you can evict people this summer.’ You can’t have both.”
Legislators also noted displeasure at the extension, including Assemblyman Kevin Kiley (R–Rocklin), who had voted the single “no” vote in the Assembly.
“This measure is an excuse for neglecting those staggering problems,” explained the Assemblyman on Thursday. “I am not going to enable that neglect by voting for it.”